Antitrust Litigation

Keys to victory.
chiffrage préjudices économiques economic damage quantum chiffrage actions de groupes class action damages antitrust damages expert évaluation préjudice antitrust concurrence déloyale commercial litigation damages contentieux d'actionnaires shareholder dispute valuation préjudice contrefaçon IP mid market m&a advisory collective banque d'affaires M&A investigation financière évaluation financials investigation & valuation évaluation indépendante entreprise independant business valuation investigations financières forensiques forensic financial investigations financement contentieux litigation funding solutions stratégie PME SME growth strategy consulting

Description:

We assist our clients, executives, and lawyers in quantifying abuses of dominant position and cartel or boycott practices.

These quantifications may be carried out following decisions by national competition authorities or the European Commission (private enforcement 6 cf. Directive 2014/104) or as part of more conventional actions (stand-alone) with judicial authorities.

We are sometimes also sought to assess potential anticompetitive damages that may result from a merger or acquisition, in order to anticipate possible objections from the authorities.

Preferred Sectors:

Digital – Agri-food – Retail

The magazine Décideurs has recognized our strong reputation in antitrust litigation in its 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 rankings.

Some references:

Google
Abuse of dominant position

Representing multiple SMEs impacted by Google’s abuse of dominant market position

Uber
Abuse of dominant position

Representing a federation of 2,480 taxi drivers and 9 associations in a class action against Uber Fr and Uber BV for engaging in unfair competition

Confidential
Anti-competitive practices

Supporting the calculation of losses related to abuse of dominant position, applying a difference-in-differences approach under EU rules

Arnaud Cluzel
Arnaud Cluzel
Partner
Disputes / Special Operations
“The keys to victory? A detailed analysis of the vulnerabilities of the opponent, research and investigative skills, comprehensive strategic thinking, a work revised twenty times, a proven argumentative structure, a perfect technical mastery of the case, a strong sense of pedagogy, a high capacity for improvisation, and a quick wit."